neutralize a powerful base like bleach? It might drop the overall alkalinity, but adding a solution of 9 to one of 12.5 isn't going to neutralize it. That would be very dangerous in a tank.
Maybe an acid like vinegar 2.9 would be better at neutralizing bleach residuals. However sodium thiosulfate, the active ingredient in dechloronators, reacts with the bleach or Sodium hypochlorite, and the chlorine is very quickly released out of the solution. It isn't hard to use.
I think you are right that sometimes we don't need to bleach things, boiling works fine on gravel. It is hard to boil an aquarium though. ;) Bleach may still not work on bacteria such as mycobacterium, the TB bacteria, because they are encased in a tough waxy substance which needs to be broken down with something like rubbing alcohol.
I'm curious about your comments on KH. I think you have spotted a problem in the water in that both the buffering capacity of the water and the minerals dissolved in it are quite low. Adding a little of one of those Great Rift cichlid salts could well help in both of those areas.
If the DH is really low, wouldn't adding a lot of sodium chloride inhibit the fish's ability to keeps it calcium, magnesium and other minerals in its system?
Sodium chloride is useful in helping fish breath when they are stressed. But they don't like it. As such. Guppies are secondary freshwater fish, suggesting that they descended from marine fish and tolerate it. The salt in a medicinal dosage is designed to irritate its skin which causes a greater production of skin slim/ mucus which keeps some skin parasites somewhat at bay. Except for those guppies which wash down to the estuarian areas of Trinidad, are there other guppy habitats which have significant salt concentrations. Many of their habitats have a pH above 7, but sodium chloride doesn't have any effect upon that, does it?
Are those KH figures absolute or do they need adjustment, depending upon what is in the water?
I know TartanGuppy reported an ammonia reading of zero. Could there have been something wrong with the measuring kit's reagent? The tank, with no fish and the elimination of the snails, would not have significantly cycled in those first six weeks. So there was not hardly any ammonia available (except maybe from a little decaying plant material) to nourish beneficial bacteria which would break later waste products down. After week three, antibiotics were added and those likely would have killed some or all of the bacteria breaking down the ammonia, nitrites and nitrates. Spinning fish can be a sign of an illness or of poisoning. The first candidate one probably should look for in terms of poisoning is one of those waste products.
A fish stressed with waste products in the water may then be more vulnerable to bacterial intrusion. Your comments about bacteria ecgo another's observation that bacteria are pretty wimpy parasites. But if water quality is iffy, that can give bacteria an opening. Red spots on the tail can be a sign of bacterial problems (see tail rot.)
The whitish fecal material of the one fish is sometimes associated with Hexamita. Yet they were reported as feeding well.
Again I think you are right, that in itself should not have been enough to kill those guppies.
Still don't know what killed those fish. We might not know unless an expensive pathologist looked at the fish and water immediately upon death.
all the best,
uncle scott
[ Parent ]